Intercambio de informacion sobre la construccion de inodoros ecologicos secos.
Exchange of information about the building of Ecological Dry Toilets (recent entries are in English, too).
(Comentarios: canaday2 ARROBA gmail PUNTO com.)
Luis Muñoz del Centro Guatemalteco de Producción Más Limpia me entrevistó sobre los inodoros secos y fue una buena conversación de 38 minutos. Les invito a escucharla. ( https://www.facebook.com/CGPML/ https://cgpl.org.gt/ )
Help wanted for a Container-based Sanitation
Project in Ecuador(En español a continuación)
In the
fishing village of Chamanga, in the province of Esmeraldas, over 100
Urine-diverting Dry Toilets (UDDTs) have been built and there has been an
effort to establish a microenterprise to maintain them, but it lacks economic
sustainability up till now.
The goal is
to convert the fertilizer power of the urine to money to pay community members
to collect and process the excrement of all of the users. One complication is
that the local climate is dry and water for irrigation is very expensive, so we
would like to explore microalgae, macroalgae, or plants that can be raised in
ponds of seawater. One product could be carrageenan, which is a food additive
that is extracted from macroalgae. Another option may be to find productive
plants that thrive on pure urine, if any exist.
There are
numerous shrimp ponds around the town and these require large inputs of
nitrogen, so human urine, which is very rich in nitrogen, could potentially be
used for this, except that one would worry about the pharmaceuticals that
people consume and are excreted in their urine. (For example, what would birth
control pill chemicals do to the shrimp?) Filtering with biochar has been found
to remove many of these chemicals and maybe solar UV could destroy these
directly. The urine could also be used to fertilize microalgae that are later
fed to the shrimp, after the pharmaceuticals have hopefully broken down. (Waste
from fishing and shrimp, including shells and heads of shrimp and bones and
scales of fish, is abundantly available and may be a useful raw material for
different processes.)
The village
has over 5000 residents, no running water, and no sewer. Low quality water is
brought by truck from the nearest river and sold by the tank. In my opinion, a
sewer would be counterproductive, as it would contaminate the Cojimíes Estuary
that the community depends on, even if there is wastewater treatment, which is
seldom effectively done in Ecuador. If this microenterprise is successful, it
could potentially finance the construction of UDDTs for the entire village, in
order to obtain more urine to fertilize with.
The project
to build these UDDTs was carried out by the Somos Ecuador Foundation and a
couple of small grants were received to try to get the maintenance operation
going, but it is still flailing. There had been a charge of US$ 0.75 per sack
of feces that was taken away, but in many cases the users could not even pay
this. In addition, collection was stopped at the beginning of the Coronavirus
Pandemic for the security of the workers.
Here is an
excellent video about this UDDT project: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r-RuitT_WAY&t=30s
We would
like to invite PhD students who are looking for a research topic, long-term
volunteers (maybe for 6 months or a year), and donor organizations to focus on
this case. I also hope to be directly involved in getting this up and running.
Please contact: Chris Canaday, canaday2@gmail.com,
inodoroseco.blogspot.com
////////
Se busca apoyo para
un Proyecto de Saneamiento Basado en Contenedores en el Ecuador
En el pueblo de pescadores de Chamanga, en la provincia de
Esmeraldas, se han construido más de 100 Inodoros Ecológicos Secos con
Separación de la Orina (UDDTs, por sus siglas en inglés) y ha habido un
esfuerzo para establecer una microempresa para mantenerlos, pero hasta ahora no
se logrado su sostenibilidad económica.
La meta es convertir el poder fertilizante de la orina en
dinero para poder pagar unos miembros de la comunidad a recolectar y procesar
el excremento de los usuarios. Una complicación es que el clima local es seco y
el agua de riego es muy cara, por lo tanto quisiéramos explorar las microalgas,
macroalgas o plantas que podrán cultivarse en piscinas de agua marina. Un producto
podría ser el carragenano, que es un importante aditivo alimenticio extraído de
ciertas macroalgas. Otra opción podría ser la de encontrar una planta
productiva que pueda fertilizarse directamente con la orina pura, en caso que
exista aquella planta.
Alrededor del pueblo, hay muchas camaroneras mucha
fertilización con nitrógeno, entonces la orina humana, que contiene mucho
nitrógeno, podría servir para esto, solo que nos preocuparíamos de los fármacos
que las personas consumen y salen en la orina. (Por ejemplo, ¿qué efectos
tendrán los químicos de la píldora anticonceptiva sobre los camarones?) Se ha
demostrado que al filtrar la orina a través de biocarbón se puede quitar muchos
de estos químicos y quizás la luz ultravioleta del sol podría destruirlos
directamente. Por otro lado, se podría fertilizar las microalgas con la orina
y, después, darles de comer a los camarones luego de que (ojalá) se
descompongan los fármacos. (Desechos de la pesca y la industria camaronera,
como huesos, escamas, cáscaras y cabezas, son muy abundantes ahí y podrían
servir para diferentes procesos.)
Más de 5000 personas viven en Chamanga, no hay agua entubada
y tampoco alcantarillado. Unos camiones traen agua de mala calidad que venden
por tanque. En mi opinión, un alcantarillado sería contraproductivo, ya que
contaminaría el Estuario de Cojimíes, donde la comunidad pesca y crían
camarones, aun si se tratan las aguas servidas, lo que pocas veces se hace con
eficacia en el Ecuador. Si la microempresa tiene éxito, podría financiar la
construcción de UDDTs para todo el pueblo, con la finalidad de obtener más
orina para la fertilización.
El proyecto para construir estos inodoros fue llevado a cabo
por la Fundación Somos Ecuador y se recibieron un par de pequeñas becas para intentar
de iniciar la microempresa, pero todavía está débil. Hubo un cobro de US$ 0.75
por saco de heces que se retira, pero muchos de los usuarios no lo podrían
pagar. Además, se paralizó la recolección al inicio de la pandemia de
Coronavirus, por la seguridad de los trabajadores.
Este excelente video describe el proyecto: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r-RuitT_WAY&t=30s
Quisiéramos invitar a estudiantes de PhD que están buscando
un tema de investigación, voluntarios de largo plazo (tal vez 6 meses o un año)
y organizaciones donantes para enfocar en este caso. También espero participar
directamente en el establecimiento y fortalecimiento de esta microempresa. Por
favor, contacten a Chris Canaday (canaday2@gmail.com,
inodoroseco.blogspot.com) para mayores informaciones.
The Shitty State of Human Sanitation (Part 1: The Problem, originally published in 2013 in http://www.chekhovskalashnikov.com/water-sanitation/Estoy traduciéndolo al español.)
For Chekhovs Kalashnikovs very first interview on Change Makers,
we will be talking with Chris Canaday, a biologist from
California, about the broken and dangerous state of human and water
sanitation systems and the solution to this problem that is damaging our
environment and health.
I
think that, before we talk about this revolutionary sanitation system,
it is important to touch on why the current system is broken. Can you
elaborate on how the contemporary western toilet came into being and the
devastating effect that it has had on the environment and our health?
It is also reported that she was so obese that she had trouble
squatting and someone decided that it was not dignified for the queen to
squat. They gave her a new porcelain throne and then, via mass
psychology, all the Western World has wanted the same thing as the queen
of England, even if it is not good for them or their environment.
The modern flush toilet has contributed greatly to the cleanliness of
cities, but has not really solved the problem, just moved it farther
away. Water always gets recycled and there are always more people living
downstream. Developed countries spend millions and probably billions of
dollars trying to clean up their wastewater, but never really succeed.
The modern flush toilet is largely based on the concept of “out
of sight, out of mind”. It is also a prime example of selfishness:
cleaning up the environment close to the user, while contaminating
everyone’s general environment.
It is interesting to note that at the same time that Water Closets were being developed, Earth Closets
were, too. There was even one reportedly used in Buckingham Palace for a
while. Over time, Water Closets won out as the standard for Modern
Western Society, likely due to their ease of use and maintenance, as
long as piped water comes to the house and sewage goes away.
Another key way in which the current, water-based sanitation system
is “broken” is that it is based on the illogical, unsustainable and
linear concept that natural resources should be used once and then
thrown away. Flush toilets not only throw away huge amounts of water,
but also all the nutrients found in the excrement.
With a simple push of a lever, we effectively deplete our
agricultural soils and contribute to the eutrophication of rivers, lakes
and oceans and, in them, the formation of hypoxic dead zones.
If these nutrients were instead given back properly to the soil (and
if the population were stable), we could forget about the non-renewable,
unsustainable chemical fertilizers that are currently the basis of
Modern Western Society’s food production. Those who learn to recycle
these nutrients in an orderly way now will have every advantage in the
future when these chemicals run out, and when there are possibly 9
billion people on Planet Earth, all wanting to eat.
Water is so essential and vital that we simply cannot live without
it. Nonetheless, modern homes in developed countries dump between 25 and
40% of their water down the toilet, and the number engineers use in
Ecuador is closer to 75%, given the high incidence of unmaintained
toilets through which water flows constantly. We need to promote a
culture of respect for water, as a source of life, which should never be
treated as a garbage dump.
If these are not enough reasons to consider the current water-based
toilet to be broken, obsolete and illogical, please consider the
following unreliable, unhygienic and not-so-easy aspects of flush
toilets:
They often need to be scrubbed after each use, if they are going to be presentable.
They frequently need to be flushed more than once for everything to go away.
They occasionally get plugged and need to be cleared with a plunger, with sewage splashing or overflowing out.
They make so much noise that everyone in the building can hear when they get flushed.
The great turbulence of flushing creates a plume of microscopic,
fecally contaminated water droplets that then land on everything in the
bathroom, including the toothbrushes.
In the interest of full disclosure, flush toilets can be
somewhat ecologically and socially sustainable in places where water is
abundant, human settlement is dispersed, and the soil is absorbent, such
that septic tanks (for settling out the solids) and leach lines (=
drain fields; for allowing the contaminated water to absorb into the
soil) can work properly, at more than 16 meters from wells or streams,
and if the septic tank sludge is treated in reedbeds.
Constructed wetlands are also important tools for treating
wastewater, but they require a fair amount of land. On top of this, who
knows how far all the different modern synthetic chemicals can travel in
the water and the soil? So, in summary, it is most prudent to not mix
our excrement in water from the beginning, especially if we have large
numbers of people grouped together in a city.
So the reason Colon Cancer is skyrocketing in the Western
World today is because we aren’t completely clearing our bowels, thanks
to a custom-made invention for a morbidly obese queen?
Yes, and not just colon cancer, but also constipation and
hemorrhoids. The natural position human beings have used when
defecating, over millions of years, since before we were people, has
always been squatting. In this position, the outlet is straight and the
body can eliminate its waste more easily, efficiently and completely.
When sitting, the outlet is not straight, certain muscles contradict
each other, one needs to push more, and not all of the feces come out,
so there is more constipation, hemorrhoids, and the colon never gets a
rest from being in contact with festering feces, causing a greater incidence of colon cancer).
Squatting has the added advantage that it is more hygienic,
especially with respect to women, since the user’s private parts do not
touch anything. (Most women apparently never actually sit on a public
toilet, but actually sort of hover above, which is much more
uncomfortable than squatting all the way down.) Also, the squatting
position is more accessible and intuitive for little children, since the
floor is the same height for everyone, while a toilet bowl made for
adults is much too big, uncomfortable and unsafe for them. Furthermore,
in Urine-diverting Dry Toilets (UDDTs), the squatting position allows
for a more certain separation of the urine and the feces, plus it is
easier and cheaper to build.
In Ecuador, where does all the sanitation waste go? How much water is used and what effect does this have on the environment?
Almost all of Ecuadorian cities’ wastewater goes straight into rivers or
bays, except for Cuenca, Shushufindi, and a few other cases where
wastewater treatment is done.
The amount of water is huge and the excrement’s nutrients fertilize
algae that end up dying and thus consuming the available oxygen in the
water, creating the eutrophication and hypoxic zones mentioned above.
But the biggest threat is that of pathogens in the water, which are
responsible for the majority of disease in the world.
Many people have daily contact with rivers, for bathing, washing
clothes or drinking, even only minutes after others have defecated in
it, so it is obvious how disease can proliferate. Need more proof?
Check out this:
Human Sanitation in Bumbay, India
I can just imagine the collective shit and piss from the
hundreds of thousands of people living in Ecuadorian cities like Coca,
Tena, and Puyo flowing into these Amazonian Rivers. What I find scary
however is that this problem is not confined to Ecuador or even the
South American Amazon but is worldwide. What happens to communities that live on river banks, lakes,
and areas prone to flooding with respect to worms, bacteria, and
water-bourne diseases, like cholera that can be prevented with this
system?
Yes, it is a discomforting thought, but the volume of shit is
actually much greater if we remember that the millions of people who
live in certain Andean cities in Ecuador, including Latacunga, Ambato,
Riobamba, Cuenca, and Loja, also dump their waste into Amazonian rivers.
Unfortunately, as you say, this situation is all too common in the
world, where 90% of wastewater goes into the environment without proper
treatment.
Even in countries like the United States, where things are presumably
all under control, there are thousands of “sanitary accidents” every
year, in which untreated sewage goes straight into the environment.
There are also numerous pharmaceuticals that cannot be removed from
the water via conventional methods, such as antibiotics,
antidepressives, and artificial hormones from birth control pills.
In addition, the current system of trying to kill the germs in the
water with chemicals in one city, and the next downstream, and the next
downstream, is a recipe for these germs to get resistant to these
chemicals, especially if at the same time people are drinking and
bathing in other peoples antibiotics. This has generated multiresistant strains of microbes that we cannot kill with chemicals to heal the people who get sick with them , nor can we be sure to disinfect a swimming pool even by adding chlorine.
In terms of health, the worst thing about flooding is that everyone is in everyone else’s shit.
This is an even bigger problem on the coast of Ecuador, where huge
areas get flooded, with millions of people being affected, and it is
getting worse with Global Climate Disruption. Urine-diverting Dry
Toilets (UDDTs), on the other hand, can simply be built above the
highest level of the flood waters.
One of the scariest results of all this fecal contamination, aside
from diarrhea, typhoid, cholera, poliomyelitis, hepatitis, and other
microbial diseases, is the high incidence of roundworms of the genus Ascaris,
which infect about one-seventh of the world human population . There is
a reason that the word for disgust in Spanish, “asco”, is so similar:
These can be almost as thick as a pencil and up to 40 cm long.
When babies are deparasitized, their diapers sometimes look like plates of noodles.
Adult female roundworms produce 200,000 eggs per day and these can be viable in shaded, moist soil for years.
The eggs do not just get swallowed and develop into adults in the
intestines. Instead, they have intermediate stages that navigate in the
host’s bloodstream, throughout the body. Eventually, they come out into
the alveoli of the lungs, get coughed up and swallowed, and only then
become adults.
Roundworm infection is a big factor in many children doing poorly in
school, since the worms consume so much of their food that little is
left for the kids’ brains.
In Part 2 of this article Chris Canaday will tell us about the solution to human waste disposal and how it will solve much of the planets sustainability problems.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The Shitty State of Human Sanitation (Part 2: The Solution, originally published in 2013 at www.chekhovskalashnikov.com/human-waste-disposal/)
In
Part 2 of this interview about human waste disposal and water
sanitation Chris tells us the solution to all of the problems mentioned
in Part 1: The Problem.
How did the new design for a sustainable human waste disposal system come into being?
In the 1950s, before the regrettable Vietnam War, a team of
Vietnamese doctors analyzed why so many people were sick and how to
control this. They found a great number of people were collecting “night
soil” in buckets that were emptied in the morning directly in
agricultural fields, where people worked largely barefoot.
The doctors realized that 90% of the fertilizer is in the urine
that transmits no disease when dispersed in the soil, while essentially
all the health risk is packaged with only 10% of the fertilizer in the
feces. The answer was to keep the urine separate and set it free on the
soil immediately, while jailing up the shit, until it is not shit any
more.
In their case, they applied a detention time of three months, plus they
added wood ash. This team that invented Urine-diverting Dry Toilets
(UDDTs) was apparently anonymous, although it would be good for credit to go where credit is due, and to know more about the process.
UDDTs were later picked up by the Stockholm Environment Institute in
Sweden, as a solution for the abundant cabins out in the Swedish woods,
where running water is not feasible in the winter due to freezing, but
they would never accept that their many beautiful lakes get
contaminated.
They also actively promote these as a means to improve the health and sanitation of billions of people in the world.
I also suspect that certain ancient cultures had UDDTs, in particular
the densely populated Amazonian peoples that made Terra Preta do Indio
(Indian’s Black Soil, in Portuguese), until they were apparently
decimated by Old World diseases soon after the arrival of Europeans.
Can you explain how the design for this human waste disposal system works?
It is very simple and seeks to follow the natural order of things.
The urine and feces that the body excretes separately are kept separate,
to be dealt with separately, since they are totally different things.
The urine is caught in a funnel toward the front, since both men and
women pee forward, and it goes back to the soil and the plants, where it
transmits no diseases. (A bit of the urine from women may drip farther
back, but this small amount is not a problem.)
Urine is normally sterile and there are only a handful of weird
diseases that it ever transmits, plus for that to happen it has to go
into rivers or contact the next person directly. The various microbes of
urinary tract infections and vaginal infections either get destroyed
rapidly in the soil or are natural inhabitants of the soil anyway. Many
of these come from the gut, but here they are in much smaller numbers
and are highly diluted, as compared to in the feces.
In addition, sexually transmitted diseases cannot live outside of the body any significant amount of time.
Feces drop farther back, directly into alternately used chambers or
exchangeable receptacles and are covered immediately with dry cover
material, such as soil, wood ash, sawdust, rice hulls, or a mix of
these. They are then stored, protected from the rain, for at least six
months in tropical countries or a year in temperate countries, so that
all the disease organisms die and it all just becomes soil.
In fact, all the worst diseases, like cholera, diarrhea and typhoid, are wiped out in a much shorter time
and the guideline of six months or a year is so that intestinal worm
eggs, which are the most resistant pathogens but are much less
life-threatening, are also eliminated. Most victims of these worms do
not even know that they have them.
Shit is a temporary condition. After its jail sentence, it’s no
longer shit: we open the chambers or receptacles and find dark,
humus-rich soil, with no smell or health risk. This
stands to reason, since our pathogens are adapted to living in water
without oxygen inside our guts, not in a pile of dry material,
especially if there is soil in the pile, with all of its bacteria,
fungus, protozoans and invertebrates.
These soil organisms are entirely at home in such a pile, where they
eat and rip up anything that is over-abundant or out of place.
After this jail sentence, we can also apply secondary treatments
involving heat, sun, earthworms or composting together with food scraps (especially thermophilic composting), for extra peace of mind or to speed things up.
We can build UDDTs for sitting or for squatting. In addition to all
the health benefits mentioned above for squatting, this also allows for
better separation of the urine and easier, less expensive construction.
Modern Western People tend to suffer from a psychological disease
called fecophobia, which is an irrational fear of feces. Shit is a
normal part of life and there is no disease in it that the user did not
have from before, so, if the person is healthy, there is no health risk
in his or her shit, only an unpleasant smell to be controlled and
nutrients to be taken advantage of. If the user is sick, their pathogens
get destroyed in the UDDT, as long as it is being managed properly.
There
can be a health risk if, in a multi-family system, some of the users
are sick and they are not using their UDDTs properly, such that some of
their feces get mixed into the urine, but this can be controlled by
storing the urine for a number of months (depending on the climate) or
distributing it below the surface of the soil, where no one will have
contact with it. The greatest health risk occurs when we do not think
rationally about this and do the irrational act of throwing it in the
river, where others can have contact immediately.
UDDTs are literally a matter of loving and trusting Mother Earth, in
which we respectfully give back that which we no longer need, to let her
deal with it. If we turn back the clock on shit, we find delicious food
on the table. If we turn back the clock again (twice in the case of
meat), we find beautiful plants growing in the sunlight. One more click
and we see rich soil, so what is to keep it from becoming soil again, if
we turn the dial forward again?
(Some commercial models do not use cover material, but rather have
electric fans to make sure the air is always going away from the user.
One of these is the Ecodomeo, which has a pedal-operated conveyor belt that carries the shit away)
The design has changed very little since the 1950’s. Have you
made any modifications to make it better suit the Ecuadorian Andes and
Amazon?
My line of work has been aimed at making UDDTs as easy and
inexpensive to build as possible, while keeping user acceptance high.
In other words, my goal is for the building of a good dry toilet
to be more a matter of a paradigm shift than a big capital investment.
For this reason, I have found ways to build with readily available
materials, especially since factory-made units are mostly not available
in Ecuador.
One of the biggest changes I made from the start was to distribute
the urine immediately via perforated hoses in the soil, instead of
storing the urine in jugs, to later dilute and apply it as fertilizer
among crop plants.
Organic farmers looking for every bit of natural fertilizer for their
plants might be willing to do the latter, but the average user will not
want to deal with smelly, fermenting urine every few days. In most of
my designs, these hoses are buried 10 cm below the surface of the soil,
among productive plants, like fruit trees, that can put the nutrients to
good use.
In the interest of making UDDTs accessible to everyone, I published a paper in the Austrian online magazine, Sustainable Sanitation Practice,
on Simple UDDTs that may be built with recycled and other readily
available materials, such as disposable plastic bottles and wood: Some of the models shown here cost close to nothing.
Another surprising innovation is the storage of feces in the
ubiquitous, woven, polypropylene plastic sacks used to sell rice, flour
and many other products. These make excellent receptacles for this use,
since humidity can evaporate out and oxygen can filter in, but flies,
smells and pathogens cannot get in or out.
At first glance, people would imagine liquids oozing out, but they
never do, thanks to the dry and absorbent cover material. Also, these
sacks last for years and years, if they are not exposed to the sun’s UV
rays. One of the biggest advantages of using interchangeable containers,
like sacks, is that, at the first sign of any problems with smell or
flies, you can simply change the container and the problem is resolved
immediately. Another is that the feces get covered better in a small
container, as compared to a big chamber.
One of the most practical ways to use these sacks is to place them as
liners of plastic bins, so the sacks are held open nicely and it is
easy to change them. It is also good to make holes in the bottom of the
bin, and have it propped up off the ground, to allow humidity to
evaporate out and for oxygen to get in, since all the worst smells
associated with latrines and sewer lines are generated by bacteria that
live in the absence of oxygen.
Even more surprising for many, I have found that the finished compost
from this system is the best material to cover new shit. Many of the
right soil microbes are still there, likely in an inactive state (like
fungal spores and bacterial endospores), ready to jump back into action
when there is more shit (with its moisture) to have a party in.
In this way, natural selection and the rapid evolution of microbes
are working in our favor, helping them get more efficient at breaking
down exactly our shit, in exactly the conditions we keep them in. In
contrast, the system of water-based toilets and trying to kill the germs
in a short time with chemicals is a recipe for evolution to produce
microbes that are more and more resistant to the chemicals used and that
are potentially more and more virulent in disease
This recycling of cover material makes the operation of UDDTs much
more practical and inexpensive, especially in cities and isolated
locations, since new cover material does not need to be acquired and
transported constantly, nor does much of the finished compost need to
trucked away. That which does have to go would not have to go very far,
if neighbors, nearby neighborhoods or nearby cities sign up for UDDTs or if urban agriculture is being done.
Another good reason to use the finished compost as cover material is
that it filters odors much more efficiently than most other materials,
removing and breaking down up to 99% of volatile organic compounds.
It has also been shown to eliminate 75% of the reduced sulfur compound emissions that most contribute to the characteristic aroma of shit in a laboratory study of conditions similar to those of commercial composting operations (Büyüksönmez et al. 2012, ), and up to 97% of the stench from landfills (Hurst et al. 2005)
There have been a couple of isolated cases of dogs or rats being
attracted by the odor and messing with the sack that is receiving the
feces, but only when sawdust was being used a cover material, not when
finished compost was being used (and this is another reason for the
plastic bin mentioned above).
Hygiene Hypothesis of Disease
Furthermore, there is research showing that children who grow up in
overly clean and disinfected homes, without contact with soil, have a
much higher incidence of asthma and allergies, since their immune
systems do not have anything to train on.
So, having soil-like decomposed feces in the bathroom as cover material
may well be a health benefit, instead of a health risk like one might
suspect, as long as we are certain that the actual pathogens have died
during its storage or treatment.
Humans evolved in complete ecosystems, including all the normal
microbes, not in sterilized boxes, so it would make sense that bringing
more parts of the ecosystem into the city would make it healthier for
people.
This is all the more reason to build green, living roofs and vertical
gardens on urban apartment buildings (and I have figured out how to do
this with disposable Coke bottles).
At the moment, you are working with Achuar communities to
implement this system. Has it been difficult to explain the
environmental and health benefits of this system? What are some of the
problems and breakthroughs you have had?
Changing anyone’s toilet habits is an imminently cultural endeavor
and it is usually an uphill battle. People need to understand the
concept, but, almost more importantly, they need to see and smell that
UDDTs work.
I have built UDDTs with a variety of ethnic groups here in Ecuador,
including mestizos, Kichwa, Shuar, Achuar, Waorani, and a little bit
among the Secoyas. Of these, the Achuar have, so far, shown the greatest
degree of acceptance. They are culturally very hygienic and
traditionally live in houses scattered widely out in the forest, so they
always had lots of forest to hygienically deposit their feces into.
They covered them with soil and leaves, where the ecosystem absorbs
them, without anyone else having contact with them.
The Achuar have only had permanent contact with white people
starting in about 1970, when schools and landing strips began to be
built and they started settling fairly densely around these.
It is also worth remembering that all the worst diseases were brought
by the Europeans and it is estimated that 90% of the indigenous people
in America died of those diseases when Europeans first came to America.
I think that potentially the Achuar have been quite concerned
about fecal contamination for the last several decades, since they
started living together in villages. Each family could be fairly certain
of its own health and not so certain of that of the others, but all the
children come together daily at the school and do their business behind
the same trees. Also, it is a matter of privacy, since some of the
villages are pretty large, with the houses fairly close to one another.
When I explain UDDTs to them, I emphasize the fact that, with open
defecation in the woods, all these microbial enemies are set free, ready
to attack us at any moment, whereas, with a dry toilet, these enemies
are jailed up until they all die. They usually get the idea very
quickly, but it is still a process to get them to build and use them,
since old habits die slowly in any group of people.
In the last year and a half, we have built 31 UDDTs in 15 Achuar
villages with the ACRA Foundation (of Italy) and the Chankuap Foundation
(of Macas, Ecuador), with support from the European Union and the Municipality of Taisha
Over several years, the Pachamama Foundation and I have built over 21 UDDTs in the Achuar villages of Pumpuentsa and Kurintsa, with a high degree of acceptance
More
are being built all the time and volunteers are welcome to help with
this. As I write this, the Achuar village of Juyukamentsa is organizing
to build UDDTs for each of 16 families and I would like to find a
volunteer to help them, especially to contribute to good replication of
the design, wood preservation, and education about their proper use and
maintenance.
So if the Amazonian Achuar tribe can be convinced, could
your average Australian, European, or North American can be convinced as
well? Can you envision a time when the whole of humanity uses this
system or are our heads too far stuck up our collective asses to change
our behavior for the better?
At first glance, this may seem like a system that is only applicable
for hippies, organic farmers, and Indians out in the woods, but, in
reality, it is a prime alternative for everyone who wants to be
civilized with their neighbors, future generations, and Nature. It is
also fully feasible in cities, especially if the relatively small amount
of shit is stored on-site during its jail sentence and is then recycled
as cover material, while the urine and excess soil is used locally in
urban agriculture. (Remember the vertical gardens I mentioned?)
We can also greatly shorten the jail sentence by storing the shit in
solar ovens, potentially down to less than a day of good sun, since all
we need to kill fecal pathogens is 7 minutes at 70°C, 30 minutes at
65°C, 2 hours at 60°C, 15 hours at 55°C, or 3 days at 50°C. (Feacham et al. 1983 and Strauch 1991, 1998, cited by Richard Higgins)
This is also more practical than cooking lunch in a solar oven, since untimely clouds do not make us put up with hunger.
The trick is to make these toilets as easy-to-use and presentable as
possible. We currently ask users to add a cup of cover material after
each use, but they do not always remember to do so and they often do not
aim very well, spilling it into the urine funnel and around the toilet.
For this reason, mechanisms are being worked out to add the cover
material mechanically, such as in one project (that I was marginally
involved in) that works via a pedal:
I even have a design in mind in which the user will not have to
remember to step on a pedal, nor would it involve electronic sensors.
Another
factor is that many users will not want to deal with the shit and the
piss. This can be resolved by setting up service-provider companies that
come to homes and offices to change the containers, hygienically
process the contents, and (optimally) put the resulting fertilizers back
to work in their own agriculture.
With these companies applying the final products in agriculture
themselves, this would increase the reliability that everything gets its
proper treatment, while converting it back to delicious fruits and
vegetables, which will be infinitely easier to market than the pee and
the poop.
This nutrient recycling is logical and necessary if we want to have
sustainable agriculture and food security. An adult eats a lot of food,
but is not growing, so all the nutrients eventually come back out and,
if we give them back to our crop plants, they have exactly what they
need to make our food again (together with solar energy).
In this way, we can forget about chemical fertilizers, if we also
have a stable population size. Of course, we have to eventually forget
about chemical fertilizers, because they come from non-renewable
sources.
It is even estimated that half of the protein found in present-day
human beings was made with nitrogen originally fixed by this artificial
process, thus being one more case of fossil fuels subsidizing economic
and population growth.
UDDTs are an important tool for combating Global Climate Disruption
more CO2 absorbed by fertilizing plants and trees,more carbon
sequestered into the soil by integrating organic matter,less methane
emitted by avoiding anaerobic fermentation of feces in water,less need
for chemical fertilizers (another big source of GHGs),less use of
petroleum for pumping and treating water,less need for cement for
building big sewers (since cement production is a big source of CO2.
Improved water-holding capacity of soils, in the face of droughts,
easy construction above the high water line (or on a floating
structure), in the face of floods,less demand for precious clean water.
Many rule out the mainstreaming of these dry toilets, as they cannot imagine the masses changing their toilet habits.
This sort of toilet is not for everyone, but it is for everyone who
wants to build a sustainable future for their children and those who do
not learn to recycle nutrients will eventually go the way of the
dinosaurs.
The Chinese have been recycling nutrients into the soil for thousands
of years and this is one of the reasons they have had a continuous,
advanced culture for such a long time. Recycling animal and human dung
is the key to sustainable farming
Una gran preocupación de las mujeres es la privacidad en el momento de orinar. Otra es el riesgo de infecciones si el baño no está limpio. Peor si se tiene que orinar en un lugar público, donde no se sabe quién ha estado ahí con qué enfermedades ... y solo hay inodoros para sentado ... y la gran mayoría de las mujeres no quieren sentarse, por temor a los gérmenes. Además, les duelen los músculos de las piernas al orinar "medias voladas" encima de esos inodoros y no pueden vaciar sus vejigas tan completamente. Es un gran problema para la mitad de la población y, a continuación, sugiero una solución.
El Wurinatu
resuelve esta situación y permite a las mujeres orinar con
privacidad, menos olores y gérmenes y hasta en un entorno natural
florecido. Comparto esta idea con el mundo mediante una licencia de
"Bienes Creativos Comunes" (en particular, se debe reconocer mi autoría,
contarme cómo le va en su aplicación, avisarme de mejoras que se hagan y
negociar conmigo su uso comercial). https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creative_Commons Wurinatu es una contracción de "Women urinate in nature"(Mujeres orinan en la naturaleza), pero también suena como: "¡Wuu! Orina, tú.", "Worry? Not you.", "Oui, nature.", "Vou urinar. Tú?", "Wow, urination is innate."y"We're ornato." (¿Suena como algo interesante en los idiomas que hablan ustedes?) Consiste en:
Un tanque de 1000 o más litros, como los del transporte del concentrado de CocaCola.
Un césped, con el debido suelo, adaptado encima del tanque.
Paredes de plantas para privacidad y para proteger el tanque. Pueden ser de setos de arbustos o trepadoras sobre sombráculos. (En caso de ser necesario, se podría incrementar otra estructura de privacidad en la parte de afuera.)
Gradas para subir.
Un embudo plástico de unos 25 cm diámetro, donde la mujer orina en cuclillas. (Hemos usado estos en Inodoros Ecológicos Secos con Separación de la Orina éxitosamente desde el año 2000.)
Una malla plástica en la "garganta" del embudo para prevenir el ingreso de basuras.
Una manguera hasta el fondo del tanque, para que el olor no pueda regresar donde la usuaria.
Salida del aire apestoso debajo de la tierra de una jardinera, donde la tierra absorbe el olor y los microbios lo consumen.
Una Fuente a Pedal, hecho de una botella plástica, para lavar las manos, con el agua regando las flores (véase una a continuación).
(Si hay agua entubada o un tanque, también podemos hacer algo similar para el lavado de manos con la válvula de inodoros de agua.) Las ventajas incluyen:
Se puede bajar completamente en cuclillas, para mayor comodidad y, como es la posición más natural, permite vaciar más completamente la vejiga (y hay donde agarrarse para equilibrio).
Más aire y menos olores, como no hay un techo.
Más luz (durante el día) y el sol ayuda a quemar microbios.
La lluvia lo limpia (y la usuaria puede usar su paraguas o chaqueta... y solo tienen que estar ahí un instante).
Cualquier salpicada de orina fuera del embudo es absorbida y transformada por el césped.
Hay menos preocupación de patógenos fecales, ya que es un sitio únicamente para la orinación (y puede haber multas para las que defequen aquí).
Observación de colibríes y mariposas que consumen un néctar mientras la mujer emite otro.
No requiere conexión al agua entubada o al alcantarillado.
1999 mujeres pueden orinar medio litro cada una antes de que se llene.
Las personas que caminan afuera podrán escuchar si algo malo ocurre adentro.
Permite guardar la orina pura para luego extraerla para usar como fertilizante en la agricultura o jardines (incluso podemos agregar otros ingredientes para fermentar mejores fertilizantes, como Nadia Andreev hace en Moldova).
La orina es una gran fertilizante y contiene el 90 % de los nutrientes que un ser humano emite. Su mayor constituyente, aparte de agua, es la urea, el principal fertilizante comercial. Este líquido dorado se extrae del Wurinatu mediante la llave en su parte inferior. Puede llevarse en canecas de 20 litros (colocadas en un pequeño hueco en la tierra frente a la llave) o un camión tanquero.
La menstruación no es un problema. Se puede quitar cualquier sangre del embudo y del césped con una botella de agua en chisguete (= atomizadora, rociadora) que está amarrada a la estructura con una cuerda (y no está incluida en la ilustración). Las copas menstruales pueden vaciarse y enjuagarse en el embudo; las mujeres pueden traer botellas de agua limpia de sus casas o usar la misma botella de chisguete (según la ubicación y la población de usuarias). Si hay agua entubada, se podría instalar una manguera rociadora, para estos fines. Toallas y tampones pueden desecharse en el tacho de basura. La mezcla de un poco de sangre en la orina no es un inconveniente en su uso como fertilizante: http://forum.susana.org/172-urinals/11084-details-on-waterless-urinals-for-women-and-for-female-pupils-in-schools-in-africa#16140
Estoy buscando dónde hacer el primer Wurinatu. En especial, pienso hacerlo en una universidad, colegio, escuela, estación de bus, parque, oficina, fábrica u otra concentración de mujeres. También, quisiera encontrar quién nos done o venda económicamente estos tanques. Variantes:
Donde hay suficiente espacio, se podría hacer esto sin el tanque y las gradas, simplemente encauzando a una manguera perforada unos 10 cm debajo de la superficie de la tierra, entre árboles frutales, plantas de banano, áreas de reforestación, etc. Podría estar al lado de la casa para mayor facilidad y seguridad, aun en la ciudad, si hay un jardín lo suficientemente grande como para fertilizar.
También tengo pensado cómo hacer esto en los metros y otros lugares donde no hay suficiente luz para las plantas. En este caso, sería de hacer las paredes de privacidad de plástico traslucente hasta la altura que sea necesaria y, de ahí hasta el tumbado, una malla. Al ser traslucente, los transeuntes y policías podrán ver que no ocurre nada malo adentro, además de lo que podrán escuchar fácilmente por encima de las paredes. La malla protegería a la usuaria de cosas que se lancen por encima de las paredes. Podría estar abierto toda la noche, ya que no se prestaría para cometer crímenes. (Esto es un gran problema en Nueva York y muchas otras ciudades.) Podríamos llamarlo un "Wurinetro" (Women urinate in the metro).
Cuando hay la 'llamada de la naturaleza', es mejor estar rodeadade la naturaleza misma.
Wurinatu:a Flowery Public Urinal for Women A major concern for women is privacy when
urinating.Another is the risk of infections, if the bathroom is not clean. Even worse, if you have to go when you are out in a public toilet, where who knows who has been there with who knows what disease ... and there are only sit-down toilets ... which most women do not want to even touch, for fear of germs. In addition, it hurts their thigh muscles to "hover" over those toilets and they cannot empty their bladders completely. This is a big problem for half of the population, and here I suggest a solution. The Wurinatu solves all these problems and lets women pee in privacy, with fewer odors and germs, and even in a natural, flowery place. I share this idea with the world via a "Creative Commons license" (in which my authorship should be recognized, I should be told how things go with its application, be advised of any improvements that are made, and any commercial use needs to be negociated with me). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creative_Commons_license Wurinatu is a contraction of "Women urinate in nature", but it also sounds like: "¡Wuu! Orina, tú.", "Worry? Not you!", "Oui, nature.", "Vou urinar. Tú?", "Wow, urination is innate.", and "We're ornato." (Does it sound like anything interesting in the languages you speak?) It consists of:
A 1000-liter plastic tank (an IBC, intermediate bulk container), like is used to transport CocaCola extract.
A lawn, with its respective soil, on top of the tank.
Privacy walls of hedges or vines on trellises. (If needed, an additional privacy structure could be added to the outside.)
Steps.
A plastic funnel of about 25 cm diameter, where the woman can urinate squatting. (We have been successfully using these in Urine-diverting Dry Toilets for 17 years.)
A plastic mesh folded into the "throat" of the funnel to keep junk out.
A hose that reaches to the bottom of the tank, so that odor cannot come back toward the user.
The smelly air that comes out of the tank filters through the soil of the flower planter, where microbes consume the malodorous substances.
A TippyTap for hand-washing, made from a plastic bottle, with the water irrigating the flowers underneath. (See below.)
(If there is piped water or a water tank, we can also arrange something similar for hand-washing with the valves from flush toilets.) Advantages include:
Women can squat all the way down, which is more comfortable and, since this is the most natural position, it allows the complete drainage of the bladder. (There is also somewhere to hold on to for equilibrium).
More air and less smell, as there is no roof.
More light (during the day) and the sun helps to kill microbes.
Rain cleans it (and people can continue to use their umbrellas and jackets ... plus they only need to be there for a moment.)
Any misdirected urine gets absorbed and transformed by the lawn.
Less concern about fecal pathogens, since this is a place only for urination (and there can be fines for those who defecate here).
The woman can watch hummingbirds and butterflies drink one nectar while she emits another.
No need for piped water or sewer lines.
1999 women can each pee half a liter before it fills.
People walking outside can hear if anything bad is happening inside.
The stored urine can be used as fertilizer in agriculture or gardens. (It can even be fermented right here with other ingredients to make an even better fertilizer, like Nadia Andreev does in Moldova.)
Urine is a great fertilizer and holds 90% of the nutrients that humans emit. The most abundant substance in it, aside from water, is urea, which is the number one commercial fertilizer. This golden liquid is removed from the Wurinatu through its valve near the bottom. This could be via 5-gallon jugs (that we can put in a small hole in the ground) or a tank truck.
Menstration is not a problem. Any blood on the funnel or the lawn can be washed away using a spray bottle tied to the structure with a string (not shown in the drawing). Menstrual cups can be emptied and rinsed into the funnel, and women can bring bottles of clean water from home for this or the same spray bottle could be used (depending on where the unit is and who the users are). If there is piped water, a spray hose can also be installed for this. Disposable pads and tampons can be thrown in the trash bin. A little bit of blood in the urine does not impede its use as fertilizer: http://forum.susana.org/172-urinals/11084-details-on-waterless-urinals-for-women-and-for-female-pupils-in-schools-in-africa#16140 I am looking for the first place to build a Wurinatu. I am especially interested in doing it at a university, high school, grade school, bus station, park, office, factory, or any other concentration of women or girls. I would also like to find someone who can donate these tanks(or sell them to us at a low price). Variations on this theme:
If there is enough space, this could be done without the tank and steps, by simply distributing the urine in the soil via a perforated hoseburied 10 cm below the surface, among fruit trees, banana plants, reforestation, etc. This can be right next to the house, for more ease and security, even in the city, if there is a big enough garden to fertilize.
Insubways and other places without enough light for the plants, the privacy walls could be made with translucent plastic that is just as high as necessary, with mesh reaching all the way to the ceiling. The translucency would allow passersby and police to see if anything bad is happening inside, plus they hear easily over the walls. The mesh would protect the user from things being thrown over the wall. It could be kept open all night, since it would not lend itself to crime, thus very important in New York City (NYC) and many other cities. We could call it a "Wurinetro" (Women urinate in the metro).
When nature calls, we want to be surrounded by nature.
Invito sus comentarios y sugerencias. También sería un gusto ayudarles a diseñar para nuevas situaciones.
canaday2 ARROBA gmail PUNTO com
I invite your comments and suggestions. It would also be a pleasure to help you design for new situations.
canaday2 AT gmail DOT com